Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicole Pratt vs Jill Craybas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pratt vs Craybas analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicole Pratt vs Jill Craybas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pratt 2 - 1 Craybas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pratt has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Craybas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pratt, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Craybas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pratt has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Craybas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pratt has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Craybas winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pratt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 30/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 8/ 20). Craybas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 51/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/ 37).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Pratt winning 2 times and Craybas being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Pratt winning 4 and Craybas winning 2. The last match between Pratt and Craybas was at the Moorilla Hobart International - Hobart, 08-01-2006, First, Hard with Jill Craybas getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pratt and Craybas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pratt winning 0 times and Craybas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pratt winning 0, and Craybas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pratt has played against opponents with an average rank of while Craybas has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pratt has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Craybas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pratt has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Craybas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
37
High
51
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
39
High
49
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
38% (242-388)
Career Total W/L
46% (341-403)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$230,755
Career Prize Money
$665,086
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nicole Pratt vs Jill Craybas For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pratt VS Craybas
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nicole Pratt | Jill Craybas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 35 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (38/56) | 59% (30/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (27/38) | 50% (15/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (9/18) | 52% (11/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (25/51) | 36% (20/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 | |||||
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Nicole Pratt
Player
Jill Craybas
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicole Pratt | Jill Craybas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicole Pratt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Nicole Pratt
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Virginie Razzano
Player
Nicole Pratt
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Nicole Pratt
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tsvetana Pironkova
Player
Nicole Pratt
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
83%
(
38 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Chakvetadze
Player
Nicole Pratt
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Pratt
Player
Jamea Jackson
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Srebotnik
Player
Nicole Pratt
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicole Vaidisova
Player
Nicole Pratt
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jill Craybas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Jill Craybas
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
3
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Jill Craybas
80%
(
75 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Magda Linette
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Kalashnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Pratt Vs Craybas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pratt are available here and Craybas photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
